" Because of its vested interest in maintaining the conflict, the anti-cult
movement has been unresponsive to objective scholarly studies, and has proceeded with
business as usual, as if these studies were non-existent. Scholars whose work directly
challenges the cult stereotype are dismissed as either naive or as being in
collusion with the cults. Rather than responding directly to mainstream social science, a
small band of anti-cultists with academic credentials have instead conducted research on
their own terms, and have created alternative periodicals which featured studies
supporting the worst accusations against NRMS. "
... Without the legitimating umbrella of brainwashing ideology, deprogramming - the practice of kidnapping members of NRMs and destroying their religious faith - cannot be justified, either legally or morally. While advocates claim that deprogramming does nothing more than reawaken cult members capacity for rational thought, an actual examination of the process reveals that deprogramming is little more than a heavy-handed assault on deprogrammers belief systems. The vast majority of deprogrammers have little or no background in psychological counseling. They are, rather, hired gun vigilantes whose only qualifications, more often than not, are that they are physically large or that they are themselves ex-cult members. " 5
As a woman who has been bullied for years by a vicious pack of lower beings, I can relate to this. Many are probably silent because they do not wish for the proverbial pen to be pointed at them; I say point away. Short of killing me, you can't possibly do more than what was done to me in my tenure as an actress. I don't care if you're afraid. Be brave. Do what's right, for once. I loathe fear. And this town is built on fear. Fear was instilled in me by the men and women of this town, just as I'm sure it was instilled in Ms. Zellweger. Fear of being blacklisted, fear of being branded difficult, fear of ... fear of ... fear of.
But it may not take coercive suggestion to affect a person’s memories. The testimony of eyewitnesses is notoriously subject to suggestion and to error, frequently with dire effects on the wrongfully accused. 6 With the advent of DNA testing, it is now possible to find, in many cases, an objective corroboration or refutation of such testimony, and Schacter notes that “a recent analysis of forty cases in which DNA evidence established the innocence of wrongly imprisoned individuals revealed that thirty-six of them (90 percent) involved mistaken eyewitness identification.”